So, What Are Agents Seeing in the Era of Book Bans?: Book Censorship News, April 21, 2023
Remember that survey of literary agents put together a month ago to see what the reality is in publishing right now related to book bans? It was widely shared across social media, as well as through several other online literary outlets. Today, let’s look at what was said.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Six agents responded to the survey. Of the six, one was an agent representing conservative books who said any “fair” reporting would report on how hard it is to get conservative voices published (when you can point me to the conservative books being banned, burned, and legislated against across the U.S. by rich, powerful groups denying access to young people, I’ll give half a shit about this grievance).
It’s not even worth reporting the results of the survey because I think the lack of response tells more than anything else.
There has been virtually no response from publishers about the ongoing rise of book bans — save for when publishers are electing to erase history and indeed, the word “racism” from books to make them more palatable — so it should come as little surprise, I suppose, that agents don’t have much to say, either.
What happens to those of us who write and publish, those of us who care about books and reading and the First Amendment, and those of us who fall anywhere in the middle of those two categories, don’t even have our own teams speaking up or out? Pushing back? Asking questions? Sharing insights?
It further fuels book bans.
When — and it’s when not if — everyone with the power (read: money, size, connections) to do things and change things give up, the slippery slop of our loss of First Amendment Rights will no longer be a slope.
There will be no rights at all.
I wish I could say I were surprised, but I’m not. It’s a lot easier to stay silent than it is to talk.
Too bad that isn’t an option for queer kids, for Black kids, for Brown kids, and for every other marginalized kid who is having their education and their access to information, entertainment, and mirrors and windows into the world around them. They can’t even look for the helpers because those who could be helpers are choosing to say little, if they’re saying anything at all.
But they’re probably not surprised, either. They go to school wondering if that will be the day they’re killed by an AR-15 while doing fascist-approved math curriculum.
Book Censorship News: April 21, 2023
Let me reiterate that the media is complicit in book bans, thanks to their insistence on paywalling information about the challenges and bans. Journalists should be ashamed of their publications doing this, since it’s in direct ethical violation of the First Amendment — including the free press.
Don’t get me started on the papers still not questioning “BookLooks” as a “source” for “book reviews.”
The media is embarrassing right now on all of this.
I’m paywalled from the first article, of course, but here is the key part: “Lee’s Summit district [MO] spent $19k reviewing 52 challenged books. That’s only half of them. The Lee’s Summit school district has spent nearly $19,000 reviewing the first half of the 90 books challenged this year by a small group looking to ban library materials” NINETEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ONLY HALF OF THE BOOKS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED. Do you understand what $19,000 can do in a school, let alone $19,000 x 2? Dighton Public Library (MA) is dealing with challenges on books about race and policing. Paywalled here, too, but some of the books are The Hate U Give, Seeing Gender, and Anne: An Adaptation of Anne of Green Gables (Sort Of). Heartstopper, Volume 2 was yanked from a Scholastic Book Fair in a Spartanburg County School (SC). Iowa City Schools (IA) pulled This Book Is Gay off shelves without review — that’s censorship — and now they’ve formed their evaluation committee. Lest it be forgotten, this all happened because of that horribly bigoted Twitter account. The Saline County Republican Women (AR) are mad about public library books. In Newton, Connecticut, schools, the right-wingers don’t like Flamer, and the book From the Desk of Zoe Washington was apparently revoked as a middle school class read aloud because it dealt with…justice and empathy. Comments are pressed. Canby School District (OR) doesn’t care about people not wanting 36 books removed from shelves. They’re still gone. A spot of good news: Ramona Blue will remain on shelves in Conroe ISD (TX). Keene Memorial Library (NE), the public library continuing to face some bigots, has bowed slightly, agreeing to move the book This Book Is Gay from the teen section to the adult section. “Connie Dianda is worried about a few dozen books that she says are currently in school libraries, she feels are obscene. She highlighted one book that she says has 58 copies at Mason City [IA] high school. It’s a graphic novel called ‘A Handmaid’s Tale.’ It includes rape and violence.” Connie, get some new hobbies. Oh, and ABC6News could bother to explain what BookLooks is here, but they don’t, choosing instead complicity in book banning and misinformation. Gender Queer might be removed from Galesburg-Augusta School District (MI), thanks to the local Michigan bigots who’ve made this area a hotbed of book bans. In Pinellas County, Florida, The Bluest Eye will return to shelves. No one knows what “perversely vulgar” means, but that’s the language in the new Wake County School Board book review policy (NC). I’m sure that won’t be exploited in any way. “I am not for censorship, but I don’t think that applies to children. These are not age-appropriate conversations to be having apart from a parent’s consent.” This is over 50-some books being challenged at the Prattville Public Library in Alabama. This one gets bonus points for one of the concerned mothers saying no one in their small town wants queer books. Anderson County, Tennessee, has seen folks sending books to the county sheriff, claiming they are breaking obscenity laws. The sheriff, um, disagrees with their assessment of the law. Oh, in Westborough Public Library (MA), apparently some people want to defund the library over a book written for middle schoolers by a medical doctor about vaginas. In Rio Rancho, New Mexico, the bigots want queer books banned from the public library. Right now, no action is planned, but I suspect it’ll come. “Some in the city of Winkler are attempting to force the local library to remove books they say are inappropriate for children, and even asking the local city council to defund the city’s only library until those books are taken off the shelves.” American political nonsense inspiring the Canadians. Crank by Ellen Hopkins will remain on shelves in Flagler County (FL) schools. Oh, you don’t say that the library was “flooded” with book ban requests for a single title after one came in? Almost…as if….it’s coordinated? Kalona Public Library (IA) is holding off on making a decision on Gender Queer. Stephen King, tell me how the kids haul their asses to get the book at their public library, again? In Saline County (AR), “inappropriate” books for kids will be removed from the public library. Cumberland County Schools (AR) have removed Push from library shelves. “The Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District is in the midst of reevaluating books available at libraries and school book fairs including the removal of any volumes deemed “sexually explicit” under state statute.” Happening in Alaska. Mat-Su has a history here. Flamer, This Book Is Gay, and Gender Queer will remain on shelves at the Staples High School Library (CT). Check the comments. Gender Queer was being challenged in Caro Area Public Library (MI) but it will remain on shelves. This article is worth reading not because it is anti-censorship but because it is a clear window into the Biblical beliefs underlying many of the book banners. Paywalled, but in Greenville Schools (NY), “sexually explicit” books are under fire, including All Boys Aren’t Blue.Copyright
© Book Riot
